Detailed Explanation of The Analects: For All Those Who Misinterpret Confucius (38)
2006/12/6 11:49:11
The Master said: When conditions are suitable for the people, let them freely practice; when not suitable, let them freely apply wisdom.
Yang Bojun: Confucius said: "The common people can be made to follow the path we set, but cannot be made to understand why."
Qian Mu: The Master said: "Those above who guide the people can sometimes only make the people follow the guidance given, but cannot make the people fully understand the purpose behind the guidance."
Li Zehou: Confucius said: "You can make the common people follow along, but you don't necessarily need to make them understand why."
Detailed Explanation: This is one of the most difficult chapters in The Analects. This chapter has long been the biggest ammunition for all critics of Confucius, while all of Confucius's FANS have been unable to refute it, only able to deflect with vapid excuses about "limitations of the era." The punctuation used by the above three and conventionally is "民可使由之；不可使知之。" There is also another punctuation: "民可使，由之；不可使，知之," which slightly diverts Confucius from the so-called accusation of keeping the people ignorant, using the notion of "education and transformation" to explain it, supposedly exonerating Confucius. The first version uses the "Qi model" to slander Confucius, the second uses the "Lu model" to slander Confucius. And Confucius long ago said that neither the "Qi model" nor the "Lu model" is the "Way of the Sage" — the so-called "Qi with one transformation reaches Lu; Lu with one transformation reaches the Way." But all those who misinterpret Confucius use the "Qi model" and "Lu model" that Confucius himself opposed to misinterpret him — this is the truth of history.
The correct punctuation should be "民可，使由之；不可，使知之。" Here, "由" has the meaning of "to tread upon, to practice" from the previous chapter, and "知" is the wisdom of "hearing, seeing, learning, and practicing" the "Way of the Sage" from the previous chapter. The previous chapter said "由知、德者，鲜矣" (Those who tread upon wisdom and virtue are forever fresh!), and this chapter follows directly from that. "可" cannot be interpreted as Kang Youwei did, as "to permit" or such, Westernizing and democratizing Confucius — using the lies of democratization to reshape Confucius is absurd. The correct meaning is "suitable" — what is "suitable" means suitable for the current position and circumstances. "民" means the masses, the people — the populace is the fountainhead of all real-world paths. When a certain position is suitable for the current reality of the people, then "使由之" — an inversion of "使之由" (let them practice it). When a certain position is not suitable for the current reality of the people, then "使知之" — an inversion of "使之知" (let them apply wisdom). "使" means "to set free, to let be unrestrained" — letting the people fully unleash their potential and wisdom.
Once you understand the previous chapter, this one is very simple. The gains from "hearing, seeing, learning, and practicing" the "Way of the Sage" belong to everyone, not to some so-called elite. "由" (practice) and "知" (wisdom) ultimately all come from the people and return to the people. The creativity of the masses is boundless, and the wisdom of the masses is boundless. One must "使之" — "set them free, let them be unrestrained" — let them freely unleash their potential and wisdom. Only this is truly "hearing, seeing, learning, and practicing" the "Way of the Sage," and only then can there be gains from "hearing, seeing, learning, and practicing" the "Way of the Sage." This chapter by Confucius has been continuously misinterpreted for over two thousand years. Compare this ID's interpretation, and you'll see the shamelessness and vulgarity of those who either attack or defend Confucius.
Chán Zhōng Shuō Chán's Vernacular Translation
The Master said: When conditions are suitable for the people, let them freely practice; when not suitable, let them freely apply wisdom.
Confucius said: What is currently suitable for the people — let the people freely tread upon and practice it. What is currently not suitable for the people — let the people freely apply their wisdom to create and innovate.
(To be continued)
Plagiarism is strictly prohibited; violators will be prosecuted.
Replies
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:04:29
[Anonymous] ataoo0
2006-12-06 12:01:43
[Anonymous] ataoo0
2006-12-06 11:10:13
Host, could you comment on yesterday's 000063 homework at lunch???????????????????
==============
This afternoon or evening. Don't rush for answers — otherwise you won't think it through properly.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:05:12
[Anonymous] llmy
2006-12-06 12:00:29
Is the article incomplete? I can't see the punctuation?
===============
Sina has issues. Refresh and you'll see it.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:07:02
Xiao Ming
2006-12-06 12:05:00
Today only discussing Confucius, not stocks.
Everything about the market is under control, except I just can't make any money.
============
The key is to determine the operational level and identify the first and second type buy points of the stock.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:09:47
[Anonymous] 外科医生
2006-12-06 12:01:00
How to handle currently profitable stocks?
Many thanks
Has the market broken down?
==============
This fluctuation is very normal. This afternoon the key is to watch Shenzhen's performance after filling the gap. If it stops there, the upward attack will resume quickly; otherwise, there'll be a few more days of choppy movement. For profitable stocks, the key depends on whether you're playing short-term or medium-term. If short-term, you should have been taking action since the past couple of days. If medium-term, use this fluctuation to do some short-term trading.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:22:01
[Anonymous] 请问
2006-12-06 12:18:16
Sister Chan, are your theorems effective on warrants??
=====
They're effective for anything with a K-line chart, but warrants carry very high risk and have time limits, so it's best to use short-term K-lines.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:31:22
[Anonymous] nn
2006-12-06 12:23:58
Host, this article makes a lot of sense, I support it. It seems old Confucius should be grateful to you — you're the one who has made the public truly understand him. Confucius is even greater because of you! By the way, a question: why is Yu Dan's lectures on The Analects so popular? And why can't the host's blog ever catch fire? I feel quite indignant about this. Yesterday a fellow blogger thought the host's articles are too profound, and I agree. Has the host considered this issue? What does the host think of Yu Dan? Just a few brief words will do.
===
Sorry, this ID never looks at these people's stuff. Cut-and-paste compilations don't deserve to be compared with this ID's work.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:34:01
[Anonymous] 外科医生
2006-12-06 12:31:10
The market has broken below the 5-day moving average, no institutional support, high-volume selling — it really looks like a top
I'm totally confused, waiting for little sister's guidance.
===========
Things require foresight. This fluctuation was already mentioned last Friday at close, and reiterated again yesterday at noon. If you didn't act, then just ride the ups and downs. Whether the 5-day line is effectively broken depends on the afternoon's performance — don't jump to conclusions too quickly. Have a better mindset.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:46:09
[Anonymous] 想飞
2006-12-06 12:32:15
LZ, please help look at 600376.
The stock's daily chart has not yet shown a sell signal, but the weekly chart seems to show divergence, and the 30-minute chart has also shown divergence. It looks like it's entering a correction.
Should I exit on the short-term rebound first?
============
On the 30-minute chart, a clear divergence appeared at 10:30 on the 1st — you should have exited the short-term position long ago. Don't look at too many charts. If it's short-term, just watch the 30-minute chart closely.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:48:49
Xiao Ming
2006-12-06 12:42:47
Chan mm, I want to do a short-term trade. I've selected a few stocks — which one do you think is best?
600770 and 000927, which one is better?
Hope for a reply!
========
This ID cannot answer this kind of question. Once this ID answers, this ID will be worked to death in the future.
Hint: if it's a very short-term move, look at the 5-minute or even 1-minute chart and see if there's a first-type buy point.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:51:38
[Anonymous] 海子
2006-12-06 12:46:49
Hello Numbers Lady! If the 5-day line is broken, the subsequent market will correct, probably by a significant margin — it may not just be ups and downs. Should we hedge the risk? Can you share your views?
============
Risks should be hedged in advance, not discussed only after the drop. Haven't I been discussing this issue for the past few days? Please see:
Chán Zhōng Shuō Chán 2006-12-01 15:02:23
Technically, the gap left by the Shenzhen Component Index today is very important. If it is quickly filled, that sends a negative technical signal.
Next Monday there will still be a need for fluctuations, but individual stock movements will continue. Since November was a massive bullish candle, a sharp fluctuation after an upward thrust in December is inevitable — one must be clear-headed about this.
Now, if you didn't prepare early, you should instead steady yourself. If you're fully invested, you can moderately reduce your position during the afternoon's or tomorrow's rebound. Since the medium-term outlook for the market is not problematic, if your short-term skills aren't strong, you don't necessarily need to play the short game.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:52:56
[Anonymous] 相当厚道
2006-12-06 12:44:39
Can 600181 resume trading? Please advise.
==========
This kind of question should be directed to the listed company or the exchange. This ID doesn't know.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 12:53:39
Market is opening, signing off first, see you later.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 15:01:20
The market today had nothing new — everything was anticipated. As I said at noon, if you didn't sell, then just enjoy the ups and downs. If you're good at short-term trading, keep busy making short-term trades. The 5-day line is key to the correction.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 15:05:13
The strongest protest against Sichuan.
Although this ID's information is extremely accurate — today, this ID's shares in a certain liquor distillery stock went limit-up even while the broader market plunged — this ID still must protest. The reason this ID bought their stock was to bleed them dry. They're selling the factory to foreigners, and this ID wants to drain their blood. This matter probably cannot be reversed. Accurate sources say the stock will be suspended in the next few days, for about two weeks, and then they'll announce the foreign devils marching in. Outrageous!
The protest will reuse the original article.
Sichuan, Don't Disgrace China!
2006-10-18 16:16:23
This ID once wrote several articles under the title "Acquiring China," forcefully arguing that China faces the real risk of being acquired. A few years ago, in this ID's famous online essay "Currency Wars and the RMB Strategy," this situation was already warned about. Later, on the day the RMB was liberalized, this ID wrote: "China has finally gone global, but can the world still remain Chinese?" Less than two years later, for Chinese enterprises today, what they face is already "The world remains the world, but can China still be Chinese?"
Regarding the de-Sinification of Chinese enterprises, one has long gone numb. In another post, I also said: well, the foreigners' money is still money, and from now on we'll just suck the foreigners' blood — let's see who's more ruthless. But these past few days, regarding news that a famous Sichuan baijiu enterprise is about to be acquired by the world's largest liquor conglomerate, it's still a bit hard to accept. Baijiu — the quintessence of China. The British, for their "British disease," can make whisky even more GAY, but who gives them the right to turn baijiu into whisky? Who has that authority?
Sichuan, don't disgrace China! The wine that Li Bai once drank, the wine that Du Fu once drank, the wine that Su Dongpo once drank. Without wine, where would Chinese culture be? Without wine, how could you have Li Bai "making three companions with his shadow"? How could Du Fu "sing freely in broad daylight"? How could Su Dongpo "ask the blue sky"? Even if all the wine in China were sold off, how could you bear to sell Sichuan's wine? A certain liquor brand became the "national liquor" based on one award from foreigners, but does it have Li Bai, Du Fu, Su Dongpo? What qualifications does it have to be the national liquor? Go sell that one, but don't sell Sichuan's wine — because that IS Li Bai, Du Fu, Su Dongpo!
Let whisky be ever more GAY, let Bordeaux be ever more SEX, but Sichuan's wine must remain Chinese, must remain Li Bai, must remain Du Fu, must remain Su Dongpo! In an era without Li Bai, Du Fu, or Su Dongpo, this is probably the most basic, most bottom-line demand of a Chinese person. People can lack morals, but they must have a bottom line. Sichuan, don't disgrace China!
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 15:08:03
There's also the latest news that one of China's largest pharmaceutical companies is being acquired by one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies. The plan — that stock is currently suspended. This ID has also taken large positions in that stock based on the principle of bleeding them dry. But this ID only hopes to torpedo this deal! In any case, even if it falls through, this ID won't lose money — the cost basis is very low. I hear it's about to be announced soon too. Outrageous!
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 15:16:20
Sell it? Of course hold it — bleed them dry.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 15:18:40
The strongest protest against Sichuan.
Chán Zhōng Shuō Chán Although this ID's information is extremely accurate — today, this ID's shares in a certain liquor distillery stock went limit-up even while the broader market plunged — this ID still must protest. The reason this ID bought their stock was to bleed them dry. They're selling the factory to foreigners, and this ID wants to drain their blood. This matter probably cannot be reversed. Accurate sources say the stock will be suspended in the next few days, for about two weeks, and then they'll announce the foreign devils marching in. Outrageous!
There's also one of China's largest pharmaceutical companies currently being acquired by one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies. The plan is in the approval process, and that stock is currently suspended. This ID has also taken large positions in that stock based on the principle of bleeding them dry. But this ID only hopes to torpedo this deal! In any case, even if it falls through, this ID won't lose money — the cost basis is very low. I hear it's about to be announced soon too. Besides causing some turbulence in the pharmaceutical sector, another large Chinese enterprise is thus brought to its knees — is it worth it? Of course, this ID will make money and drain their blood, but this ID still expresses outrage!
The protest will reuse the original article.
Sichuan, Don't Disgrace China!
2006-10-18 16:16:23
This ID once wrote several articles under the title "Acquiring China," forcefully arguing that China faces the real risk of being acquired. A few years ago, in this ID's famous online essay "Currency Wars and the RMB Strategy," this situation was already warned about. Later, on the day the RMB was liberalized, this ID wrote: "China has finally gone global, but can the world still remain Chinese?" Less than two years later, for Chinese enterprises today, what they face is already "The world remains the world, but can China still be Chinese?"
Regarding the de-Sinification of Chinese enterprises, one has long gone numb. In another post, I also said: well, the foreigners' money is still money, and from now on we'll just suck the foreigners' blood — let's see who's more ruthless. But these past few days, regarding news that a famous Sichuan baijiu enterprise is about to be acquired by the world's largest liquor conglomerate, it's still a bit hard to accept. Baijiu — the quintessence of China. The British, for their "British disease," can make whisky even more GAY, but who gives them the right to turn baijiu into whisky? Who has that authority?
Sichuan, don't disgrace China! The wine that Li Bai once drank, the wine that Du Fu once drank, the wine that Su Dongpo once drank. Without wine, where would Chinese culture be? Without wine, how could you have Li Bai "making three companions with his shadow"? How could Du Fu "sing freely in broad daylight"? How could Su Dongpo "ask the blue sky"? Even if all the wine in China were sold off, how could you bear to sell Sichuan's wine? A certain liquor brand became the "national liquor" based on one award from foreigners, but does it have Li Bai, Du Fu, Su Dongpo? What qualifications does it have to be the national liquor? Go sell that one, but don't sell Sichuan's wine — because that IS Li Bai, Du Fu, Su Dongpo!
Let whisky be ever more GAY, let Bordeaux be ever more SEX, but Sichuan's wine must remain Chinese, must remain Li Bai, must remain Du Fu, must remain Su Dongpo! In an era without Li Bai, Du Fu, or Su Dongpo, this is probably the most basic, most bottom-line demand of a Chinese person. People can lack morals, but they must have a bottom line. Sichuan, don't disgrace China!
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 15:28:09
Give it a few years, and there probably won't be many Chinese-owned enterprises left.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 15:31:22
[Anonymous] 在路上
2006-12-06 15:27:00
I accidentally boarded Sister Chan's ship this time. I also hold some of that liquor stock. Resolutely support your protest!!!
=============
We must protest, but we must also make money. How is this expressed in The Analects? Let the people below answer — let's see how well you've all studied The Analects.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 15:47:42
[Anonymous] ataoo0
2006-12-06 15:38:52
The Master said: "It is people who can broaden the Way, not the Way that broadens people."
============
Wrong. This ID already gave the answer to this question — in "Teaching You to Trade Stocks 10" there's this passage:
Not so — this is the perfect application of what this ID explained yesterday from The Analects: "The Master said: What the masses despise, one must examine; what the masses favor, one must examine." Indeed, from the perspective of likes and dislikes, this ID is strongly against RMB appreciation and against the circulation of state-owned shares, and has deeply analyzed the real-world logical relationships and serious consequences behind these things. But in the stock market, this ID has never had likes or dislikes. Anyone with a bit of financial common sense knows that the historic bull markets triggered by historic appreciation of a nation's currency have been experienced by too many countries. This ID only knows that once the RMB appreciates and state-owned shares start circulating, the stock market will surge. Why are intellectuals laughable? Because they have likes and dislikes but no "examination" — they try to use theory to dictate reality, their brains thoroughly waterlogged.
The Analects and stocks are not contradictory.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 15:51:27
[Anonymous] 摄影之友
2006-12-06 15:46:42
Indeed. Situations like this seem to be increasing. There are also American investments entering. The host should assemble a group of major capital holders like yourself to conduct counter-acquisitions!! Hmph.
The Master said: "Act solely for profit, and you will incur much resentment."
==============
The answer is above. If you think this way, it shows you haven't studied The Analects well. Think deeply on this one — it has infinite benefits for both people and stocks: "What the masses despise, one must examine; what the masses favor, one must examine."
The enemy is now very powerful. A frontal assault is useless — we can only constantly harass to strengthen ourselves. As long as we don't get eliminated, one day we'll launch the grand counterattack and acquire all of America and Europe.
Now is the time to build strength and conserve one's forces. Use every opportunity to drain their blood.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 15:54:13
Chán Zhōng Tīng Chán
2006-12-06 15:48:39
Confucius said: When you encounter a big villain, you'd be a fool not to profit. And after profiting, you want to profit some more.
Answer complete. Thank you!
===========
The meaning is correct, but you need method. Could a big villain become a big villain without capability? To defeat a big villain, you have to be even nastier and even stronger than them — drain every last drop of their blood.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 16:10:02
[Anonymous] 心易
2006-12-06 16:06:23
I see — the host wants to cultivate us so we can go drain their blood together in the future!!!
=========
That would be ideal. But don't say "cultivate" — rather, it's mutual learning.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 16:20:48
[Anonymous] 无聊
2006-12-06 16:17:41
May I ask, LZ, I also want to buy some of that liquor stock you mentioned — to drain their blood. Is that acceptable?
=============
Leave this arduous task of blood-draining to this ID. The medium-term buy point passed long ago — the risk is too great. This ID's cost basis is different. This ID does not recommend anyone chasing high prices to buy in.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 16:31:08
[Anonymous] 妄语
2006-12-06 16:00:58
Following Chan sis's method, a first sell point seems to appear on 600519's weekly and daily charts right now? Price has made new highs, but MACD is starting to diverge.
==========
On the weekly chart, there is no divergence. On the daily chart, it will evolve into a MACD double-top pattern. This pattern was discussed in yesterday's replies — first a decline approaching the 0 axis, then another rise forms the real daily-chart divergence.
Of course, for the short term, on the 30-minute chart you can find the precise sell point at 13:30 on the 1st. Then today when the MACD pulls back to the 0 axis in the afternoon, you can buy back. But this is all very short-term — for those with small capital, you can absolutely operate this way.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 16:33:19
Chán Zhōng Tīng Chán
2006-12-06 16:25:44
Since I'm fully invested in China Merchants Shipping, I can't support Master Chan with money, so I'll support with my presence.
=========
Were you the one who, based on what this ID said yesterday about the technique of buying when new stocks break through the high of their first trading day on high volume?
If you've learned it, then use it — China Merchants Shipping's movement follows this pattern exactly.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 16:34:25
[Anonymous] Little Bird
2006-12-06 16:01:49
Could you explain what divergence is? Many thanks!
======
Tomorrow I'll write a post about this issue.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 16:36:57
[Anonymous] 想飞
2006-12-06 13:26:14
LZ, it seems I have to turn my short-term position in 600376 into a mid-term hold. I hope to break even soon. This is probably the price one must pay in the learning process.
I feel that judging the position during moving average entanglement is quite difficult, unless the trend is already confirmed, but by then the best buy/sell points have been missed. So frustrating.
============
For the short term, look at the 30-minute chart at most. Look at 10:30 on the 1st — isn't that a classic first-type sell point? Study the chart carefully.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 16:44:42
Chán Zhōng Tīng Chán
2006-12-06 16:39:45
That was indeed me
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Chán Zhōng Tīng Chán
2006-12-05 15:36:01
Reporting to Master Chan
Following Lesson 7 ("There is one simplest method — watching all new stocks that break through the highest price of their first trading day on high volume")
I entered 601872 China Merchants Shipping at a cost of 6.7
I'm ecstatic!!!!!!
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
The above was yesterday's follow-up post.
=============
That's right, but for techniques you haven't fully mastered, it's best to study them well first — for example, the issue of first-type buy and sell points. Opportunities abound; the key is having good technique.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 16:46:16
Signing off. The weather in Beijing today is bad — overcast and gloomy all day. See you later.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 21:32:58
[Anonymous] 缠禅
2006-12-06 20:52:49
Numbers mm, on the 30-minute chart of 000503, does it appear that a divergence formed at 10:30 on December 1st? How come it didn't decline much afterward and made new highs instead? Please analyze, mm. Thank you.
=============
Your way of thinking is wrong. Divergence only tells you that the corresponding uptrend is concluding, but it doesn't promise how long or how deep the correction will be. This should be resolved by looking for first-type buy points on a lower-level chart. Look at the stock's lower-level 5-minute chart — at 10:25 on the 5th, a clear first-type buy point appears. That's the best opportunity to re-enter, and none of the subsequent rally was missed. Look at this short-term result:
Sold near 9.7 yuan at the 30-minute divergence at 10:30 on the 1st; re-entered at the 9.2 yuan first-type buy point on the lower-level 5-minute chart at 10:25 on the 5th. Besides pocketing the price difference, you also freed up two trading days to do other things. This operation fully conforms to the trading procedure this ID has outlined.
For a single short-term trade to have this kind of result — there's probably no other system in the world this efficient.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 21:44:03
[Anonymous] 想飞
2006-12-06 14:18:02
LZ, look at 600050's weekly chart. Does the week of 2005/10/21 form a divergence with the week of 2005/6/3? The subsequent price action shows this was a failed first buy point, correct?
Looking forward to your answer!
================
The week of 2005/10/21 didn't make a new low — both were at 2.43. That's not a standard divergence, so it doesn't constitute a standard first-type buy point.
Rather, this stock formed a standard first-type buy point on the daily chart at 2.19 yuan on August 7, 2006. You can analyze that.
On the 30-minute chart, the most recent standard short-term (30-minute chart) first buy point was at 2.68 yuan on November 14, 13:30.
Study it carefully. If following this ID's principles, even using the 30-minute chart, one should have bought after the 2.68 yuan point appeared on November 14 at 13:30. Up to today, no first-type sell point has appeared on the stock's 30-minute chart, so even looking at the 30-minute chart, one should continue holding.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 21:50:03
[Anonymous] 缠禅
2006-12-06 21:43:19
Thank you, Chan mm, for the interpretation. I understand a bit more now.
On 000063's weekly chart, the first buy point appeared on April 30, 1999. The first sell point, found through the daily chart, was on November 13, 2000. The second buy point was January 2, 2003. The next sell point was May 19. The third buy point was July 12, 2005. Until now, the third sell point hasn't appeared! Is this analysis correct?
=============
April 30, 1999 was a second-type buy point. On the weekly chart of this stock, the most standard and only first-type buy point was during the week of January 3, 2003 at 12.69 yuan.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 21:55:58
Everyone should look at many different charts — that's how you develop a feel, especially for those who play the short game.
Signing off, see you later.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 21:57:40
Chán Zhōng Tīng Chán
2006-12-06 21:38:52
Master Chan is back. Greetings!
===========
Good, good night.
Signing off, see you.
缠中说禅 2006/12/7 10:59:42
Serious notice: this ID never recommends any specific stocks, and has always been against chasing high prices. If you're going to buy, buy at first-type buy points. Don't get confused.
缠中说禅 2006/12/6 11:55:52
Yesterday at noon, this ID already repeated last week's advisory, so you should have been prepared for today's fluctuations.
Chán Zhōng Shuō Chán 2006-12-05 13:46:42
Have to leave early, won't be here this afternoon, will come online in the evening. The following advisory remains in effect:
Chán Zhōng Shuō Chán 2006-12-01 15:02:23
Technically, the gap left by the Shenzhen Component Index today is very important. If it is quickly filled, that sends a negative technical signal.
Next Monday there will still be a need for fluctuations, but individual stock movements will continue. Since November was a massive bullish candle, a sharp fluctuation after an upward thrust in December is inevitable — one must be clear-headed about this.