Attention Everyone, Serious Correction
2007/9/13 20:55:15
Attention Everyone
Serious Correction
After the market closed today, things kept coming up and phone calls wouldn't stop. Then I had to rush off to see a company. The driver arrived on time, and this ID was racing to finish writing the article — didn't even have time to proofread it once, which led to a serious error in today's chart segmentation. In the future, I'll try to schedule more time for writing posts, but sometimes things are simply too busy. If errors occur, please forgive me.
The erroneous segmentation is still in today's closing analysis — this ID will not modify it. Leaving the mistake there serves as a comparison, which greatly helps in learning segmentation. The error was in mistakenly treating the section at the green arrow as a line segment — this is wrong. If you look carefully at the fold in the middle, you'll see it doesn't constitute a stroke, and a line segment requires at least three strokes.
Therefore, according to the correct segmentation, the market's trend shows stronger momentum than the erroneous segmentation indicated. That is, the pullback starting from point 93 is a standard line-segment-level rally that hasn't even formed a 1-minute hub yet. Of course, if tomorrow's opening breaks below 96, a 1-minute hub will form. But if it doesn't break, the line segment starting from 97 continues extending. If the subsequent line segment pullback doesn't break 96, then this line-segment-level rally will have extended to 3 quasi-hubs — that would of course be an extremely strong performance.
As for the other analyses, they remain valid. The 5-minute hub oscillation starting from point 76 hasn't formed a third-type sell point. The line-segment-level rally has already pierced through 5265 points, which is naturally even more powerful than a 1-minute trend type piercing through 5265 points.
Tomorrow, pay attention to where this line-segment-level rally ends. Then the line segment adjustment coming down will inevitably form a 1-minute hub. The subsequent trend is entirely related to the evolution of that 1-minute hub — this is too simple and doesn't need to be spelled out in detail.
Wait, let me look for those who discovered this ID's error — they all get a big red flower.
[Anonymous] 赚到了
Delete all comments by this person
2007-09-13 17:18:33
[Anonymous] laowang
Delete all comments by this person
2007-09-13 16:23:07
Question:
Chan MM: 98——99 isn't a line segment, right? It's just a stroke. Do any classmates have a different opinion?
=========
Same feeling — the line segment starting from 97 hasn't finished yet.
[Anonymous] Sina User
Delete all comments by this person
-
2007-09-13 17:10:22
A question: 98 to 99 shouldn't be a line segment, right? My view is that the line segment starting from 97 hasn't finished yet. Please discuss.
[Anonymous] Sina User
Delete all comments by this person
-
2007-09-13 16:27:34
I think the segmentation of sections 98 and 99 has problems. I only segmented up to section 97. Would the moderator please explain? Thank you.
Found quite a few — there may be some I missed. Big red flowers for all.
This proves, as this ID has repeatedly said, that this ID's theory is like geometry — it can be discussed with 100% rigor. There are no authorities here; even this ID is not one. When this ID is wrong, this ID is wrong — there's nothing more to say.
Some say making a mistake is no big deal — it's just one segment that was wrong. But the difference here is enormous, because this way, the market's true strength and other factors get analyzed incorrectly. What was actually a line-segment-level rally got turned into a 1-minute trend, and the pullback magnitude would be completely different. The smaller the level, the greater the pullback strength it implies, so it must be absolutely precise to truly reflect the market's actual situation.
Segmentation must be approached with the most rigorous attitude — only then can you truly see what the market is doing.
One more note: regarding the fundamentals of 600078, there have been related rumors for about 2 months now, but at that time there was no word on the quantity of the mine. There have been new developments recently, but whether it can ultimately be injected into the listed company is a question far from answered. Moreover, this ID has not yet seen the detailed exploration data, so everything is merely a rumor. Even if this ID were to see the official detailed exploration report soon, it is absolutely no guarantee that this asset will be placed into the listed company — so one must not take this as reliable.
Replies
缠中说禅 2007/9/13 21:15:17
[Anonymous] Sina User Delete all comments by this person
2007-09-13 21:13:24
Looks like tomorrow will be nice weather
==
Please do not predict — look at the current chart. The stock market doesn't need wishes; it only needs real operations.
缠中说禅 2007/9/13 21:16:34
[Anonymous] Leisurely Delete all comments by this person
2007-09-13 21:08:24
I noticed it too — boss, give me some praise
I just didn't have the guts to say it
==
If you have something to say, please say it. In this ID's space, anything can be said — as long as Sina can handle it, this ID's space can handle it.
缠中说禅 2007/9/13 21:17:47
Sorry, stayed up late watching the match last night. Need to rest early today. Signing off. Goodbye.
缠中说禅 2007/9/13 21:10:56
One more note: regarding the fundamentals of 600078, there have been related rumors for about 2 months now, but at that time there was no word on the quantity of the mine. There have been new developments recently, but whether it can ultimately be injected into the listed company is a question far from answered. Moreover, this ID has not yet seen the detailed exploration data, so everything is merely a rumor. Even if this ID were to see the official detailed exploration report soon, it is absolutely no guarantee that this asset will be placed into the listed company — so one must not take this as reliable.