From the Debate Over Economic Models, Online Leftists Are Precisely the Most Degraded Product of Capital's Identity's Ignorant Reproductive Drive

Today I accidentally went online and saw a debate about economic models. Taking a quick look, I found that the online left and right factions are truly making no progress at all. The rightists' "infantile faction" characteristics need no mention -- let me talk about the leftists.

Just as radicals are usually the greatest conservatives, warriors against globalization are now becoming globalization's greatest promoters. The paradox between name and substance has always found its richest interpretation among leftists. Yet names are originally nameless, how can substance truly be substantial, origins are originally without origin -- since Old Marx departed, each generation of leftists has been worse than the last. By now they have mutated to the point where, like online leftists, only their reproductive function remains.

Economy is politics. Capital globalization's identity structures every structure of the world homogeneously, including the reproductive function of online leftists. Just as deconstructionism, which surpasses structuralism in this regard, is as heinous as capital itself -- against this backdrop, all the idle talk about structure, deconstruction, models, and such proves nothing but a kind of ignorant reproductive drive of capital's identity, with no other significance. And online leftists are precisely the most degraded product of this ignorant reproductive drive of capital's identity.

Marx is not a Marxist. The picture of reality has never exceeded Old Marx's pen. After Old Marx there is no Old Marx. All things historically so-called related to Old Marx have only been most diligently realizing the very objects Old Marx criticized. Online leftists merely repeat this historical paradox a priori without knowing it. Old Marx is reaping these fleas with nothing left but their reproductive function, and this irrefutably proves Old Marx's profundity and incomparability.

Who told him to be Marx!