Peking University Really Is Superior to Tsinghua—Netizen "Math," If You Have Any Academic Integrity, Step Up and Admit Your Error!

Chán Zhōng Shuō Chán

This is a perfectly normal academic question. Netizen "Math" proposed that all human thought can be represented in binary digits. This ID used a very simple method to prove it wrong. Netizen "Math," if you have any academic integrity, step up and admit your error! Peking University and Tsinghua have been competing for a long time, but when it comes to mathematics, Tsinghua has no contest with Peking University. I hear Netizen "Math" is from Tsinghua, though not a mathematics major, so having some academic errors is not surprising. But anyone from Tsinghua, no matter how brilliant they think they are, should still admit mistakes when they make them. At the very least, anyone from Peking University would never try to cover up an error!

As for the clamoring of others, those people don't even have the most basic mathematical knowledge. This ID has no time to wrangle with them. Some things are too kindergarten-level, and this ID has no obligation to teach them. Even if they remain forever unenlightened, that's their problem—this ID will just enjoy the show. But if Netizen "Math" still has a shred of academic conscience, please step up and admit the error, or academically demonstrate that this ID is wrong. If this ID is truly wrong, this ID will certainly admit the mistake. But on this particular question, that's impossible. Because if this ID were wrong, then the method used to prove this ID wrong would necessarily also prove that set theory and some of the most foundational mathematics contain errors. In that case, Netizen "Math" would become a great master—but the chance of that happening is probably zero, even if you wait until the end of the universe!