Netizen Mathematics, Stop Weaseling -- Surely You Haven't Forgotten Your Own Words?

Netizen Mathematics has already lost all composure and begun weaseling, refusing to even acknowledge their own words. They actually wrote a post titled "To Miss Chan: It Turns Out You Falsified My Words," which states: "When Miss Chan first quoted my 'words,' I assumed she was honest, so I took it at face value that I had said such things. But later I discovered she had falsified them. And this falsification is extremely critical. The words Miss Chan falsified as mine: 'From a mathematical theory standpoint, dichotomy, that is, using binary numbers, can express the entirety of human thought and laws of motion, because these thoughts can all be stored in binary computers.' My original words: 'Therefore, all of humanity's current discoveries about society and the natural world, all descriptions of laws, all principles of various disciplines, are all stored in various publications, and publications can all be stored in computers.'"

However, "From a mathematical theory standpoint, dichotomy, that is, using binary numbers, can express the entirety of human thought and laws of motion, because these thoughts can all be stored in binary computers" IS the original words of netizen Mathematics. See for yourself: Discussing with Yunguzi the Relationship Between Dividing into n Parts and Dichotomy
[Mathematics] posted on 2006-08-05 21:13:42
http://www.qglt.com.cn/bbs/ReadFile?whichfile=1484611&typeid=17

The very first paragraph is this sentence: "From a mathematical theory standpoint, dichotomy, that is, using binary numbers, can express the entirety of human thought and laws of motion, because these thoughts can all be stored in binary computers." To deny something so plainly evident -- for a person in their fifties, what more can you say?

Of course, some people say "Mathematics" is actually a writing team, which would explain this situation nicely. The ones who truly have a habit of falsification are the leftists themselves, such as that famous example of changing "ashamed to face" to "ashamed on behalf of." Additionally, the diagonal method works equally well in finite cases. For example: 1000, 0100, 1010, 1001 -- the diagonal number would be 0000, which is not among these four numbers. Other cases are analogous.