Demolishing the Absurd Theory of Netizen "Math" in "I Still Think Female College Students Selling Sex Is Fake News"

In the article "Demolishing the Absurd Theory of Netizen 'Math' in 'I Still Think Female College Students Selling Sex Is Fake News,'" a direct rebuttal was already given to the errors made by Netizen "Math" in "I Still Think Female College Students Selling Sex Is Fake News." This article will take a different angle, using proof by contradiction to conduct a deeper examination of the flawed premise in Netizen "Math"'s article. Following the method of proof by contradiction, let us first assume that Netizen "Math"'s premise in "I Still Think Female College Students Selling Sex Is Fake News"—"It is absolutely impossible for someone to sell a genuine gold necklace from their home at the price of copper just because of poverty"—holds true. Following similar logic, we can make an analogous statement: "It is absolutely impossible for someone to convert sex into other forms of pleasure just because of divorce." From this premise, we proceed with the following reasoning:

Since a widely circulated article online in which Netizen "Math" cursed his wife tells us that he has been divorced for many years, and since Netizen "Math" is still an ordinary mortal whose physiological sexual drive certainly still exists, according to the premise that "it is absolutely impossible for someone to convert sex into other forms of pleasure just because of divorce," sex can only achieve pleasure in the form of sex. As is well known, Netizen "Math" has publicly and vehemently condemned certain behaviors of Netizen "Old Yan," therefore extramarital affairs such as keeping a mistress, one-night stands, seducing female students, seducing married women, and other non-marital sexual behavior between men and women are impossible for Netizen "Math." And certain juvenile activities of unmarried men are certainly unsuitable for a man of experience like Netizen "Math." Under normal circumstances, the object of sex can only be a person. Summarizing the above, the only remaining possibility is other men. That Netizen "Math" is a man should be beyond question. A man whose sexual object is other men is homosexual. Therefore, Netizen "Math" is homosexual.

Since the conclusion that Netizen "Math" is homosexual is clearly absurd, the premise of the above reasoning—"It is absolutely impossible for someone to convert sex into other forms of pleasure just because of divorce"—is wrong. The correct premise should be "Among divorced people, there are still those who can convert sex into other forms of pleasure," such as Netizen "Math." Correspondingly, the premise "It is absolutely impossible for someone to sell a genuine gold necklace from their home at the price of copper just because of poverty" is wrong. The correct premise should be "Among people in poverty, there are still those who would sell a genuine gold necklace from their home at the price of copper," such as those female college students who sell sex.

In short, the authenticity of news can be determined by a straightforward real-world investigation. Attempting to deny the truth of news by arguing that the entire situation could not possibly occur is the most laughable approach. This is the final conclusion of this article.