Market Analysis, Cancer Treatment, and Preview of This ID's Weekend and Next Week Activities

2008/6/12 15:23:31

Before the market analysis, let me first address some of the most basic common sense, because there are too many confused eggs in this world—especially certain so-called Chinese people who can't even speak proper Chinese and are clearly on assignment. So these common-sense matters must also be addressed, even at the cost of time.

A most basic Chinese language phenomenon: when we say something is "-ified" (化), whatever is being "-ified" is certainly not the thing itself. For example, when we say "Americanized," what's being Americanized is certainly not America itself but something else—like some turtle or whatever. The "mathematicized proof" that this ID mentioned in this morning's article means it is not a mathematical proof per se, but rather a proof by analogy using an example from mathematics. And this proof is merely to give everyone a glimpse of the general contours of cycles and reincarnation. Moreover, this ID specifically emphasized at the very beginning that the "most direct understanding of historical cycles and the six realms of reincarnation naturally comes from returning to the cycles and reincarnation of history and the six realms to experience them firsthand." Even a purely mathematical proof would only be one form of proof under the premise of human cognitive patterns—it has no absolute validity and cannot substitute for this kind of firsthand practice and verification.

So can historical cycles and the six realms of reincarnation be given a purely mathematical proof? Of course they can. However, this first requires axiomatizing both concepts and giving precise definitions of the basic terms. For example, for historical cycles, we must first define the concept of historical driving force from the perspective of the resultant force of people's efforts, then prove that this driving force is linear with respect to people's component forces, and then define historical events, along with the corresponding sets, cycles, and so on—step by step making these vague concepts mathematically precise, and finally proving the existence of cycles. The idea here is simple: axiomatize history mathematically. Without mathematical axiomatization, where would any purely mathematical proof come from?

In fact, the purely mathematical proof outlined above can be completed by anyone with a reasonable foundation in modern mathematics. But the people here mostly can't even understand a mathematicized proof, so there's no need to discuss the purely mathematical version.

Additionally, since most people's knowledge of science and philosophy is very poor and they're easily intimidated, this ID will give everyone the simplest criterion: observables. The most fundamental concept of modern science is not anything else but observables. Anything discussed within the scope of science must be observable. Therefore, everything involving non-observables is suspect—such as the infinity of the universe, the infinity of events, mysterious natural laws, divine revelations, the so-called universal laws triggered by dialectical materialism or this-ism or that-non-ism, and so on.

Science's greatest achievement lies in dismantling mysticism. This ID often criticizes science only because what can be dealt with scientifically is merely a small part of the universe. The rest does not require mysticism either—it equally possesses the scientific spirit but not necessarily the form of science. There exist far more things in the universe that are neither science nor mysticism. But science is life's baseline—if you can't even get science straight, you've truly lived in vain.

As for the stock market's movement, under the illumination of this ID's theory, it is equally scientific—whatever should happen, happens, with no ambiguity whatsoever. Over these past few days, there has been no forceful rebound, and as long as you look at the MACD on 30-minute or higher charts, you'll know this is perfectly natural, because no truly significant-level divergence has appeared at all. On the 60-minute chart, you can't even call it a divergence segment—so how could there possibly be a major bounce?

As for the specific trend going forward, if you really enjoy predicting for fun, it's also quite easy. This final leg down from the 3786 point must form at least two hubs; otherwise, it's still oscillation within the previous hub, which means this wouldn't yet be the final drop. So: there is now one hub above 3300 points. Therefore, for this round of decline to complete, the most standard path would be: first, a rebound to form a second hub—the fluctuation range of this hub is basically impossible to fill the gap—and then another breakdown to form a true divergence.

Of course, the above describes the standard decline scenario with two hubs. If external factors are severe, a multi-hub decline is also possible—this is guaranteed by the theory. The key is whether there is true divergence after the third-type sell point of the second hub, which is very easy to determine in real time. As for the less common scenario of no breakdown, where a lower-level movement directly transitions into a higher level—that would be the situation where a third-type buy point appears at the second hub. Should this uncommon scenario occur, it falls entirely within the theory's observable range, so it's still fully manageable.

If any of the above is unclear, please humbly go study. Losing money is your own affair, reading or not reading is your own choice, and the skills you ultimately develop are your own. So figure it out for yourself.

Although the theory was personally discovered and invented by this ID, this ID's philosophy has always been that knowledge belongs to all of humanity—individuals should not hoard it. So this ID has been gradually making the theory public, solely for the conviction that knowledge belongs to all humankind. It has nothing to do with sympathy or pity. Therefore, those who benefit from studying it need not thank this ID—just as you don't need to thank Euclid after learning plane geometry. As for those who try every which way to prove plane geometry wrong—that's fine too; it's still better than playing mahjong or foolishly running into the stock market to lose money. The same goes for this ID's theory.

As for those who ask about cancer treatment—presumably they've seen that this ID's treatment results have been particularly good. But it must be pointed out here: Buddhism speaks of arising through the conjunction of causes and conditions. This ID arrived at this juncture through such karmic conditions. It was not achieved through a single treatment or single medicine, but through the conjunction of numerous factors. Moreover, this ID has not yet been completely cured, so it cannot be said that the previous results were truly effective.

However, this ID can state that once I thoroughly cure myself according to my own approach, then this ID will have complete confidence in saying that I've fully understood what cancer is and the corresponding treatment methods. Cancer is fundamentally not a terminal illness at all. When it ultimately becomes terminal, it's always because of incorrect views and methods. Once this ID truly achieves a complete cure, I will have the full confidence to treat cancer as easily as treating the common cold.

Cancer is not even what traditional Chinese medicine calls phlegm-heat stagnation and the like—those are merely surface phenomena. Cancer is far simpler than anyone imagines. As for the specifics, when the karmic conditions are ripe, this ID will naturally lay everything out. This ID has no habit of keeping knowledge secret.

However, before making it public, the biggest challenge may not be this ID's own cure, but rather that this ID needs to find a way to thoroughly study a technique that was lost since the Qin Dynasty. Because right now, this ID's theory and vision are extremely advanced, surpassing all current perspectives in both Chinese and Western medicine, and this has already been validated through my own practice. But because I haven't mastered that technique, if this ID wants to actually examine a specific person, I cannot pinpoint the exact location of the root cause of illness. I can only give a rough outline, then tell the person to seek out such-and-such and roughly follow such-and-such treatment approach. That's not very satisfying.

Only one person in the world currently knows this technique. This ID has had the fortune to become acquainted with this person, but this fellow keeps saying he'll take this knowledge to the grave. This ID, once recovered from this illness, will definitely mobilize every means to salvage this uniquely surviving treasure. This ID believes that knowledge belongs to all humanity, but this fellow only considers it a single-lineage family tradition. None of his current descendants can learn it, so into the coffin it goes. The divergence of views is indeed quite thorny, but this ID will definitely make every effort.

Actually, this ID doesn't need this person to teach everything from scratch. If he just points out the key parts, with this ID's thorough understanding of traditional Chinese medicine, I could even invent an improved version of the technique. Whether or not I have this karmic connection will determine whether this ID can save more people in the future. I hope things go as intended.

Since both the doctors and this ID agree that Beijing's climate and dietary habits are very likely to trigger a relapse, the decision has been made to base myself primarily here for the next two to three years. So a house needs to be purchased and settled into, which means this weekend I'll be out looking at and buying property.

Honestly speaking, from this ID's personal standpoint, I thoroughly welcome a major Asian financial crisis—at least then I could buy a house for half the current price. Moreover, this ID has been holding an extremely light position, essentially empty, so I wouldn't mind seeing a level of one thousand and some-odd points. Just imagine: selling Chalco at 60 yuan and buying it back at 6 yuan—my illness would practically cure itself on the spot. But from the standpoint of national interests and the interests of all citizens, things certainly can't go that way. What this ID is currently doing actually harms my personal interests, but that's not something this ID cares about.

This ID long ago ceased to have any material wants. The key concern is not wanting to see the country and its people bullied by foreigners. This bout of serious illness has revealed several people's true colors, so all business relationships with these individuals will be thoroughly settled after this ID recovers. Being here in this city, I've noticed that financial awareness is still very poor—completely mismatched with the city itself. So I may ignite a spark in the private equity investment sphere, leaving some fire seeds in this place as well.

Next week, there's a very high probability of another round of chemotherapy. Actually, this round of chemo is completely unnecessary, but having stayed at this hospital for so long without treatment, even the doctors here would start wondering if this fellow really has cancer. Besides, it was agreed that the dosage would be reduced—three days of IV therapy followed by all oral medication. I've never tried this format before, so why not play one more round.

As for this ID achieving a complete cure, it requires a certain traditional Chinese medicine treatment method. Having mobilized all connections, I've located the two most formidable practitioners in both northern and southern China—but both are already in their 80s. So the search must continue. These traditional Chinese medicine techniques are being lost at an alarming rate. When you're fortunate enough to encounter them, you must learn them; otherwise, once lost, it would be nothing short of a catastrophe for humanity.

As for those who nowadays peddle books using some Chinese medicine terminology and talk about minor meridians and minor acupoints—they're still miles away from real Chinese medicine. It's fine for killing time with casual talk, but the truly good stuff definitely isn't there.