By Mathematician's Own Logic of Stripping Himself Bare, STEM Thinking Is Male Ape-Man Thinking

2006/2/27 21:02:40

This lady's post "Doesn't stripping someone bare presuppose that even the underwear has been removed?" drew the following reply from Mr. Mathematician: "The presupposition of stripping someone bare is that the person is wearing clothes or other coverings. If nothing is worn, there is nothing to strip. Having not even underwear on is the result of stripping, not the presupposition. I truly admire you — earning quite a few clicks with such a headline."

First, Mr. Mathematician uses the word "earning" to linguistically connect with click rates. As the saying goes, "words reveal the heart." It seems Mr. Mathematician's Foolish-Old-Man-Moves-Mountains-style posting was in fact related to "earning." As for earning what, and for whom — that is not something this lady has any interest in speculating about.

Second, in real society, when we speak of a person, we usually assume they are wearing clothes, unless they are bathing or engaging in certain special activities. Since Mr. Mathematician's STEM thinking considers "wearing nothing at all" a necessary assumption while being online, this corresponds to only three possibilities: 1. Mr. Mathematician bathes while being online. 2. Mr. Mathematician engages in a certain special activity while being online. (Of course, one can also engage in certain activities while being fully dressed, like the right-winger Clinton. Since Mr. Mathematician is a leftist banner, he would naturally disdain the shameless practices of the right, so this scenario can be disregarded.) 3. Since the above two scenarios already encompass the most basic possibilities for a person not wearing clothes, if neither applies, then the only possibility is that the premise of being "a person" does not hold — and Mr. Mathematician is also not female. That is, the third scenario can only arise in a non-human, non-female state, and the most realistic highest-order possibility of such a state is a male ape-man.

Finally, the above analysis was all triggered by STEM thinking producing the "wearing nothing at all" assumption. Although this lady has always emphasized that "the left are hooligans, the right are idiots," this lady still believes that even hooligans would not simultaneously bathe or engage in certain special activities while browsing the web or visiting the Strong Nation Forum. Therefore, the only possibility that stands is: by Mr. Mathematician's own logic of stripping himself bare, STEM thinking is male ape-man thinking! Unless Mr. Mathematician admits that he simultaneously bathes or engages in certain special activities while browsing the web or visiting the Strong Nation Forum.