Then Let Men Risk Their Lives Resisting Rape!
2006/7/22 15:13:53
The reason the topic "should women risk their lives to resist rape" gets so hotly debated simply continues to prove one fact: a filthy male-dominated world continues to exist in its filthy way. Of course, no question carries unconditional a priori necessity. In the history that humanity has actually historicized, for the vast majority of time, the only question that existed was: should men risk their lives to resist rape? It is only in the most recent few thousand years that this question was shamelessly and disgustingly altered.
Of course, even during men's most pride-worthy dynasties, there existed sufficient periods to restore their original memory of the more ancient proposition "should men risk their lives to resist rape." For example, in a certain era, men were called "kept men" (mian shou). That era is now shamelessly called the Tang Dynasty, and the current male-culture Chinatown cacophony is merely to cover up this male history of being kept men — because they must conceal this fact: the great Tang Dynasty of men ceased to be great because of a woman who turned men into her kept men.
The fact that men can be raped probably needs to be periodically awakened by history. Of course, this kind of rape is absolutely not discussed in the sense of men's disgusting, revolting Brokeback Mountain. Every proposition of male-dominated society is built merely on the foundation that male-dominated society can be sustained. When one pathetic man after another uses various pathetic excuses to discuss "should women risk their lives to resist rape," they are merely inertially carrying out the most pathetic, filthy dealings of a male-dominated society that continues to be shamelessly and absurdly sustained by inertia.
The existence of male-dominated society is merely a joke of history. To resolve the topic "should women risk their lives to resist rape," the only path is to return to the kind of society where the more original topic — "should men risk their lives to resist rape" — becomes the topic again. In such a society, there would be ample time to fabricate concepts like chastity, morality, violence, and responsibility as garbage to educate men. There could also be fabrications of all manner of despicable systems, ways of thinking, and discourses to arm the mainstream consciousness of "making men risk their lives to resist rape." In these tricks, men actually have no special talent. Regarding the relationship between men, their chastity, and violence, there would be ample time to fabricate textbooks more excellent than what today's lowly male consciousness can produce.
In those textbooks, men would be taught to risk their lives resisting rape! Every fabricated concept, system, way of thinking, discourse, and instrument would be used to make men willingly risk their lives resisting rape! The textbooks would tell men: although men who are not raped are still garbage, men who are raped are not even as good as garbage — they have no meaning of existence. Die! The textbooks would tell men: men get raped only because they were too flirtatious, they dressed too provocatively — they deserve it. Die! The textbooks would tell men: this violence of men being raped cannot be attributed to society. They were merely unlucky. But for the sake of men's chastity, for the sake of social justice — die!
Obviously, to put an end to the topic "should women risk their lives to resist rape," what is urgently needed is such a textbook, urgently needed is the environment in which such a textbook exists, urgently needed is the society corresponding to the environment in which such a textbook exists. And that society is not far away. The emergence of male-dominated society is merely a historical joke. The collapse of male-dominated society is an imminent event that is no joke. When that time comes, there will be ample time to write and perfect such a textbook!