Homosexual Hegemony — A Cancer on Global Garbage Culture!

2006/2/28 14:19:07

Recently some mountain got manufactured into a trendy commodity by the globalized cultural production machine. Spring has arrived, the snakes are all out, and those who can't tell whether they're bros or sis are starting to hop around too, demanding this right and that right. Homosexual hegemony is running rampant.

Originally, if you wanted to engage in sleeve-cutting and peach-sharing in dark corners, that's your own business. Is there any need to flaunt it? If a group of people enjoy doing non-human things with non-humans, should they also establish an organization and demand rights? At this rate, the Dog Association, Horse Association, and Pig Association will soon acquire the same special connotations as the Rooster, Duck, and Goose Associations.

Admittedly, historically many formidable figures had such predilections — from Socrates, Plato, Da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Shakespeare to Mahler, Tchaikovsky, Wittgenstein, and so on. Horowitz even said "a pianist who is not homosexual cannot be a good pianist." But did these people earn their place in history because of their predilections?

Male ape-men already face a serious existential crisis with the advance of technology. Instead of doing something useful, they go and pursue this kind of tedious nonsense. How can you expect this woman to respect you? Homosexual hegemony — a cancer on global garbage culture! When a society treats the tedious as interesting, whether that society itself has a problem truly becomes a problem.

This woman has no discrimination against anyone. What people do in private is their own business. But flaunting it publicly is a different matter. When homosexual hegemony pesters society's eardrums like Xianglin's Wife, shouldn't this woman's disgust also have a channel and a need for expression?